On 11/3/20 5:10 PM, clime wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 15:40, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Dne 03. 11. 20 v 11:54 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> git (amahdal, besser82, chrisw, pcahyna, pstodulk, skisela, tmz)
> git.src requires cvs
> git-cvs.noarch requires cvs
>
> <everything else> ( <everybody else>)
> <package> requires git
>
> Note that if xinetd indeed goes away, your package will most likely not be
> affected, unless you actually need git-cvs.
>
> Nontheless the packagers should review their packages whether they indeed have
> to depend on the full-blown git which pulls in Perl and Python. Very probably
> they could switch to a tinier git-core:
>
>
> Or switch to depend on `%{_bindir}/git`?
If we do it like this, we will never be able drop repo download times
for Fedora users.
I personally think packages should depend on package names only even
though filelists.xml lazy loading is not yet implemented
(
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...).
Actually, several locations end up in primary metadata.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_dire...
And as a side note, it is not recommended to use %{_bindir} in buildrequires.
The package actually needs /usr/bin/git even if you redefine %{_bindir} (e.g. in
a flatpak build). However I cannot find the discussion about this.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok