Jesse Keating wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2003 17:45, Hugo Cisneiros wrote:
>But I always asked... Why not put by default? Lots of people are
using
>it instead of ext3.
Because it's not as heavily tested as ext3 by the RH folks. They
don't
have confidence in it enough to allow it to be a default installer option.
I agree on this as well.
me too.
*ext3* is the _only_ native fs supported by RH. Neither jfs nor reiserfs are
supported, though RH kernel brings them.
Why does people want XFS? Any _special_ feature?
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically