Paul Howarth píše v Pá 06. 03. 2009 v 10:34 +0000:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527#c3
>
> The above review is blocked because I want to include three example
> scripts in the documentation, and I want them to be executable so that
> people can run them without an unnecessary extra step.
>
> rpmlint warns about this (spurious-executable-perm). But I think rpmlint
> is wrong.
>
> There are scant guidelines about this - just one oblique reference in
> a "packaging mistakes" page. There is no convincing explanation I can
> find as to why including an executable script in documentation is a
> bad thing.
They sometimes pull in additional dependencies.
When they are e.g. Perl script, that's the main reason IIRC
Dan