2009/1/6 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>:
>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot
<nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> writes:
[..]
Surely you don't want to be automatically mailbombed with the rpmlint
output from all of your packages. That would only lead to bogus
changes just to shut up equally bogus complaints, or some random
syntax in comments within a specfile indicating what rpmlint
complaints are expected. Does anyone actually want that?
Most of I guess wants rpmlint output(my assumption). What they decide
based on that output is upto them.
It is not in plans to replace reviewer or even rpmlint or change the
workflow. Decision will always be with reviewer. And reviewer will
decide what is bogus or not.
--
rakesh