2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks <jbrooks(a)redhat.com>:
Hi all --
As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora
Atomic WG, I started packaging asciibinder[1] with the intention of
getting the package into Fedora. Along the way[2], I encountered a
bunch of required, unpackaged dependencies, which would also have to
be added to Fedora.
[1]
http://asciibinder.org/
[2]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/
asciibinder/packages/
It has me wondering whether packaging these gems as rpms is
worthwhile, especially since we'd end up running asciibinder in a
container, anyway.
What are people's thoughts on the value of packaging gems -- it's it
worthwhile, is it somehow UnFedora to not bother to package them?
Having them packaged as RPM ensures their licenses have been checked and
binaries are built from sources.
I'm +1 for having them packaged.
Jason
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
<
http://www.teraplan.it/redhat-osd-2017/>