On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:44 +0100, David Woodhouse dwmw2@infradead.org wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what
it
turns out to be. This disqualifies the distribution(s) as desktop Linux distributions, as desktops tend to need to run the latest and greatest for as far the latest and greatest lets them.
Does that make sense?
As a standalone observation, perhaps -- some desktop users often don't want old, stagnant code; they'd prefer the latest bells and whistles.
But it makes no sense when considered in conjunction with your apparent desire for an old, stagnant version of Fedora.
What makes you think it would be any different?
As described on the Feature page, but if there's any specific questions about the reasoning on there I'll be happy to answer those questions.
-- Jeroen