Hi Zbigniew,
Also, what is the relationship between https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This is the version that is currently used in rawhide.
BINUTILS231 is the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.31. The 2.31 release has not actually happened yet - it is scheduled for July 7
- but if it does happen in time then I would like to get it into rawhide
before the mass rebuild happens. Then if there are any problems they should show up quickly.
But changes are specific to a Fedora release. If users see both changes in the release notes for F29 they will be justifiably confused. So I think BINUTILS230 should be automatically dropped (superseded) if BINUTILS231 makes it into F29.
Oh, right, now I understand. I agree, we should drop BINUTILS230 if BINUTUILS231 makes it in.
Cheers Nick