Adam Jackson wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Adam Jackson <ajackson <at> redhat.com> writes:
Requires moderately non-trivial fixes to the X server build system too, which is why I haven't done it yet. Probably should do though. I just hate to be in a situation where we're shipping CVS bits in FC6; I keep hoping Mesa will hurry up and release a 6.5.1 already.
Anything I can do to help? Are you really planning on updating mesa for FC-6, or would it be worth my time to see if I can isolate a few important r300 fixes and backport those?
Planning a backport, yes. There are apparently enough Intel and <=R200 issues fixed in CVS that it should just be done whole. Hopefully 6.5.1 happens Really Freaking Soon so I don't have to ship CVS bits in FC6.
That said, if updated srpms for mesa and xorg-x11-server were to magically appear in Bugzilla for me, I certainly wouldn't object ;)
Magically appearing SRPM for latest mesa-CVS filed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201365
I've been using this with great success on an x86_64 in both 64 and 32 bit mode (I compiled it in a 32 bit chroot and installed the result on my 64 bit Fedora for use with googleearth).
You also speak about xorg-x11-server changes, I haven't got any for you as things work fine for me with the current xorg-x11-server in RawHide.
Regards,
Hans