Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 à 14:32 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 20:18 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Anyway the damage is done, decent reporters will forgive the bug zapping
> project this time but you've just expended your error budget and will
> need to win a lot of credibility back before another mistake is
> forgiven.
No, sorry, you don't get to pull crap like that. The Triage team's
plans were posted many times and ratified by the Triage team/QA and then
FESCo, and announced again. You had your chance at providing input and
making it "better".
That's not crap that's reality.
You can publish discuss get reviewed approved as much as you want that
does not remove all responsibility if flaws are found in the approved
plan once implemented. An approval and review procedure never changed
the fact that ultimately the person or team doing a proposal had the
most visibility and brainshare to spend on it. If it works out they get
the fame. If not they get the shame. Bad karma can be earned back.
Given the state our old bug triaging was the bug zapping team will have
lots of opportunity to win good karma.
--
Nicolas Mailhot