Rex Dieter wrote:
When it comes to *current* reviews/packages, simply follow the
current guidelines.
Sure, that seems obvious. But there has been confusion about usage of
a vendor_id previously (which I attributed to reviewers mistaking
vendor_id for the Vendor: spec file tag). What I was wondering was
whether there was an effort to change the guidelines regarding the
vendor_id. If there is, the issues that *may* be caused by dropping a
vendor_id from an existing .desktop file need to be addressed.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
People are crazy and times are strange
I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range
I used to care, but things have changed