Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> said:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:57 -0600
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net> wrote:
> I would think that making it release based rather than time based
> should be okay. If there have been N released shipped without
> package foo, then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or
> 2).
Possibly, but that info isn't super easy to find. You would need to
look at the scm-commits list to see when it was retired.
If it was release-1 or release-2, those are both current and still
getting updates; checking the current trees on a mirror would show if
the package was in either release.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.