Hi,
On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >
> > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users
> > > that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack.
> >
> > I'm not intrinsically _opposed_ to rebasing X in F20. But it's not
> > something we've done in any previous Fedora, and there are enough nvidia
> > users out there that I'd want to be cautious about not breaking them
> > more than we need to.
> >
> > If That Other Repo doesn't have a problem with getting builds lined up
> > for nvidia/fglrx/whatever I'd be much more willing to do X rebases in
> > existing releases.
About the other repo rpmfusion, we just need some time on
updates-testing to rebuild all drives , but I can ask for more details
on rpmfusion mailing list .
It's still tricky for things like the xwayland/gnome
> > lockstep, but I think we know how to handle that.
>
> Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ?
Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice. But if
someone else wants to, sure, go for it.
the most important thing, for me, is understand what is your opinion (X
team) about testing Xserver 1.15 , It is worth testing Xserver 1.15, or
we should focus on 1.16 ?
and sorry about my bad English
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.