rawhide and branched composes for 2015-09-18
by Kevin Fenzi
Just a heads up to anyone interested:
Both branched and rawhide composes failed this morning due to two
issues:
1. There was a space issue on koji's nfs volume.
2. Someone changed the permissions on the 'update-comps' script in the
comps repo so it was not executable.
Both of these are now fixed, so I have restarted both branched and
rawhide composes. They should land later today.
kevin
8 years, 8 months
Orphan some JS packages
by Remi Collet
Maintaining JS packages is just a mess.
So I will orphan soon:
ckeditor (siwinski, as coowner, want to take ?)
prototype
scriptaculous
syntaxhighlighter
Open ACL request if you want one of them.
Remi
8 years, 8 months
Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures
by Alexander Todorov
Including fedora-devel on this topic.
На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа:
>>>
>>> Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the hundreds ?
>>
>> How many, exactly? We have around 20000 SRPMs in the distribution.
>
From today's Rawhide snapshot my script counted around 4500 offending packages.
You can find links to the script and execution log here:
http://atodorov.org/blog/2015/09/16/4000-bugs-in-fedora-checksec-failures/
Please let me know which packages need to genuinely be excluded and what should
we do with these packages ? Some will probably be fixed once they are rebuilt
but that may take a while.
Any package maintainers out there - please fix your packages in Rawhide so we
don't have to file bugs for all of them.
Thanks,
Alex
8 years, 8 months
Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?
by Marcin Juszkiewicz
My traceroute [v0.85]
puchatek (0.0.0.0) Thu Sep 17 14:42:22 2015
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. krzys.lan 0.0% 16 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0
2. 192.168.0.1 0.0% 16 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.0
3. ???
4. 89-75-11-97.infra.chell 0.0% 16 8.5 9.7 7.3 16.4 2.1
5. 84.116.252.162 0.0% 16 224.2 220.9 218.1 227.2 2.4
6. 84.116.252.174 0.0% 16 219.6 220.3 218.3 226.8 1.9
7. 84.116.252.9 0.0% 15 223.8 221.4 219.9 225.0 1.5
8. 84.116.252.41 0.0% 15 230.5 221.8 219.6 230.5 2.7
9. 84.116.136.141 71.4% 15 44.0 42.3 40.7 44.0 1.3
10. 84-116-130-130.aorta.ne 0.0% 15 222.2 220.3 218.2 227.9 2.3
11. ch-zrh02a-ra1-xe-2-1-0. 0.0% 15 224.3 229.6 219.6 251.9 11.2
12. 84-116-130-125.aorta.ne 85.7% 15 42.3 41.5 40.8 42.3 1.0
13. 84-116-130-122.aorta.ne 0.0% 15 148.2 149.9 145.4 177.0 8.2
14. 84.116.133.158 0.0% 15 222.7 220.7 219.5 222.7 0.7
15. mpr1.sjc7.us 0.0% 15 222.5 223.3 219.4 253.3 8.5
16. ae9.cr1.sjc2.us.zip.zay 0.0% 15 249.4 225.0 218.8 249.4 9.7
17. v11.ae29.cr1.lax112.us. 0.0% 15 232.1 231.2 228.1 240.9 3.1
18. ae7.mpr3.phx2.us.zip.za 0.0% 15 242.7 239.8 236.5 249.9 3.5
19. 208.184.108.38.IPYX-072 0.0% 15 223.8 222.8 221.5 226.2 1.1
20. border1.po1-bbnet1.phx0 0.0% 15 221.7 222.2 220.7 226.0 1.3
21. redhat-2.border1.phx004 0.0% 15 226.7 224.8 222.0 238.2 3.9
22. tx-160-181-132-209.redh 0.0% 15 222.4 222.7 221.4 227.2 1.4
23. pkgs.fedoraproject.org 0.0% 15 232.3 225.3 222.6 232.3 2.7
This is my connection to pkgs.fedoraproject.org machine. Fetching 48MB
archive reached 36% in 2 (two) hours...
We ship binaries through mirrors all around the world. yum/dnf knows how
to use them to get packages in a quick way. Knows how to handle lack of
connection etc.
But sources used to build packages came from one place. ONE...
Why? Why we are not have them mirrored?
Or if we have then which magic option I did not managed to find yet?
8 years, 8 months
Fedora 23 Branched 20150917 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150916:
Cloud base Vagrant x86_64
Docker Filesystem x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud atomic Vagrant x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
No images in 23 Branched 20150916 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52
ID: 2852 Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
ID: 2849 Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 2845 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_pata
ID: 2779 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
ID: 2764 Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space
ID: 2762 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_partial
ID: 2754 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
ID: 2749 Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs
Passed openQA tests: 44 of 52
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
8 years, 8 months
Fedora Rawhide 20150917 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150916:
Cloud base Vagrant x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud atomic Vagrant x86_64
Cloud base Disk x86_64
No images in Rawhide 20150916 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 51 of 52
ID: 2859 Test: i386 universal server_software_raid
ID: 2858 Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid
ID: 2855 Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid
ID: 2844 Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 2838 Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 2837 Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install
ID: 2836 Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install
ID: 2835 Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
ID: 2834 Test: i386 generic_boot default_install
ID: 2833 Test: x86_64 generic_boot default_install
ID: 2832 Test: x86_64 generic_boot default_install
ID: 2831 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
ID: 2830 Test: i386 universal server_lvmthin
ID: 2829 Test: i386 universal server_ext3
ID: 2828 Test: i386 universal server_btrfs
ID: 2826 Test: i386 universal server_simple_encrypted
ID: 2825 Test: i386 universal server_repository_http_graphical
ID: 2824 Test: i386 universal server_scsi_updates_img
ID: 2823 Test: i386 universal package_set_minimal
ID: 2822 Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap
ID: 2821 Test: x86_64 universal server_lvmthin
ID: 2820 Test: x86_64 universal server_ext3
ID: 2819 Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs
ID: 2817 Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty
ID: 2816 Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space
ID: 2815 Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_encrypted
ID: 2814 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_partial
ID: 2813 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_pata
ID: 2812 Test: x86_64 universal server_sata_multi
ID: 2811 Test: x86_64 universal european_language_install
ID: 2810 Test: x86_64 universal server_shrink_ntfs
ID: 2809 Test: x86_64 universal server_shrink_ext4
ID: 2808 Test: x86_64 universal server_updates_img_local
ID: 2807 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
ID: 2806 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
ID: 2805 Test: x86_64 universal server_kickstart_hdd
ID: 2804 Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap
ID: 2803 Test: x86_64 universal server_lvmthin
ID: 2802 Test: x86_64 universal server_ext3
ID: 2801 Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs
ID: 2799 Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty
ID: 2798 Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space
ID: 2797 Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_encrypted
ID: 2796 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_partial
ID: 2795 Test: x86_64 universal server_repository_http_variation
ID: 2794 Test: x86_64 universal server_repository_http_graphical
ID: 2793 Test: x86_64 universal server_mirrorlist_graphical
ID: 2792 Test: x86_64 universal server_delete_pata
ID: 2790 Test: x86_64 universal server_scsi_updates_img
ID: 2789 Test: x86_64 universal server_sata_multi
ID: 2788 Test: x86_64 universal package_set_minimal
Passed openQA tests: 1 of 52
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
8 years, 8 months
Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners
by Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks!
Thanks for all your feedback on this, folks, and sorry for messing up
the links in the original post :)
Thanks to all your work we had sufficient information to determine the
bug does not need to block the Beta release, so we don't need any more
feedback now, thanks very much. The information on upgrade testing and
workarounds was also useful and will be documented in the Common Bugs
page.
Thanks again!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
8 years, 8 months
Problem with build system?
by Susi Lehtola
Hi all,
I was just trying to build QMsgBox-0-6.20130830git94677dc, but the build
fails on all distros. The difference to the earlier release is that I
put in a qt5 build, and split the headers to a separate subpackage.
The packages build successfully, but crash in the postprocessing stage:
BuildError: mismatch when analyzing
QMsgBox-headers-0-6.20130830git94677dc.fc22.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was:
error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Permission denied (13)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
removed REQUIRES QMsgBox(armv7hl-32) = 0-6.20130830git94677dc.fc22
added REQUIRES QMsgBox(x86-64) = 0-6.20130830git94677dc.fc22
Is the build system ill?
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org
8 years, 8 months