Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers
by Toshio Kuratomi
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If
they're not interested in maintaining or we can't locate them I'll have
FESCo orphan the packages so that others can take them over.
If you have a way to contact any of these maintainers, please let them know
that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages. Thanks!
Maintainers:
* awnuk -- former email address awnuk(a)redhat.com
- comaintainer of dogtag-pki, dogtag-pki-theme, pki-console, pki-core,
pki-ra, and pki-tps
* llim -- Lawrence Lim -- former email address llim(a)redhat.com
- Bugzilla owner of redhat-lsb
* osier -- Osier Yang -- former email address jyang(a)redhat.com
- comaintainer of libvirt
If we get to the point of removing acls for these people, only redhat-lsb
will need a new owner. The other packages just have these package
maintainers as comaintianers.
-Toshio
10 years
[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 16. May 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting
by Phil Knirsch
As we dropped last weeks meeting early due to low attendance we're going
to cover the same topics this week again:
Agenda:
- Follow up / status update merge reviews
- Open floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com>
Wankelstrasse 5 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/
D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
10 years
EL5: krb5-devel-* not found
by Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon
Hello all,
I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
this error
DEBUG util.py:282:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-5/getPackage...:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
DEBUG util.py:282: Trying other mirror.
DEBUG util.py:282: Error downloading packages:
DEBUG util.py:282: krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2.i386: failed to
retrieve krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2.i386.rpm from build
Same happen with the other architectures (ppc and x86_64)
This dependency is brought in by my dependency on voms-devel =>
openssl-devel => krb5-devel
Does anybody know what could be the reason for this missing rpm, or how
to get around this?
Regards.
10 years
Mass Rebuild for Fedora 21
by Dennis Gilmore
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877
that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC49
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
we will start the mass rebuild on 2014-06-06, all existing side tags
and anything that you wish to land in Fedora before the mass rebuild
needs to be completed by 2014-04-26. we will be merging over all side
tags at that point and removing the targets for them.
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over
when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats.
please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=aG6O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
10 years
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-15 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-05-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-05-15 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-05-15 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-05-15 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2014-05-15 17:00 Thu Europe/London BST
2014-05-15 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CEST
2014-05-15 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CEST
2014-05-15 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST
------------------new day----------------------
2014-05-16 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT
2014-05-16 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2014-05-16 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST
2014-05-16 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
= Followups =
(approval and retirement sections already passed, /opt exception passed)
#topic #339 software collections in Fedora
.fpc 339
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339
#topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft
.fpc 382
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
#topic #400 Exception for bundled library FoX in exciting
.fpc 400
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/400
(needs to be reworded to match new .desktop wording)
#topic #414 Please consider requiring AppData for all desktop applications
.fpc 414
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414
(seems fine, needs more votes and rebase/provide answer)
#topic #418 Bundling exception for reaver-wps
.fpc 418
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/418
(dots in name, utility of ruby without rails)
#topic #419 ruby193 in SCL
.fpc 419
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/419
(needs fakesystemd, or another solution)
#topic #425 systemd or systemd-units should not be required if a spec
file does a %systemd_post command
.fpc 425
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/425
= New business =
#topic #422 move an existing package to a different upstream fork
.fpc 422
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/422
#topic #423 Bundling exception request (copylib) for TommyDS library
used in SnapRAID
.fpc 423
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/423
#topic #424 Bundling exception request for nodejs-weak-map
.fpc 424
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/424
#topic #426 Need policy and macros for binfmt.d file handling
.fpc 426
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/426
#topic #427 Bundling exception requests for new julia package
.fpc 427
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/427
#topic #428 Exception for bundling css in infrastructure application
.fpc 428
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/428
#topic #429 Bundling exception request for apitrace: libbacktrace
.fpc 429
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/429
#topic #430 Minor PHP Guidelines change
.fpc 430
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/430
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
10 years
Detecting unnecessary build requirements
by Richard Shaw
As packages age sometimes build requirements chance and may not be caught
by the package maintainer. Is there a known way of determining if there are
unnecessary build requirements in a package?
I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities
of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that
against the requires of the resultant packages.
Thanks,
Richard
10 years