Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-11
by Michael Schwendt
======================================================================
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
======================================================================
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
beagle
bmpx
clipsmm
f-spot
fedora-business-cards
kdeedu
openmpi
ppl
qscintilla
R-RScaLAPACK
rubygem-actionmailer
rubygem-main
rubygem-rails
scheme2js
tomboy
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-i386:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
rubygem-actionmailer-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.i586 requires libbigloogc-3.1b.so
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.i586 requires libbigloo_s-3.1b.so
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
rubygem-actionmailer-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.ppc requires libbigloogc-3.1b.so
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.ppc requires libbigloo_s-3.1b.so
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc64:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
rubygem-actionmailer-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-x86_64:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs
bmpx-devel-0.40.14-8.fc11.i386 requires bmpx = 0:0.40.14-8.fc11
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
qscintilla-python-devel-2.3.2-2.fc11.i386 requires qscintilla-python = 0:2.3.2-2.fc11
rubygem-actionmailer-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libbigloogc-3.1b.so()(64bit)
scheme2js-20081219-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libbigloo_s-3.1b.so()(64bit)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-i386:
ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.i586 requires libpl.so.5.7.6
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc:
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.ppc64 requires kdeedu-marble = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.ppc64 requires kdeedu-math = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.ppc64 requires kdeedu-kstars = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.ppc64 requires kdeedu-libs = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc requires libpl.so.5.7.6
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc64:
beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0
beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gsf-sharp) = 0:0.0.0.7
beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0
beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0
beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(taglib-sharp) = 0:2.0.3.2
beagle-evolution-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0
beagle-evolution-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(evolution-sharp) = 0:5.0.0.0
beagle-gnome-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0
beagle-gnome-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0
beagle-thunderbird-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0
ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc64 requires libpl.so.5.7.6()(64bit)
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2
tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0
tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0
tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0
tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-x86_64:
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.i586 requires kdeedu-marble = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.i586 requires kdeedu-libs = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.i586 requires kdeedu-math = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
kdeedu-4.2.4-1.fc11.i586 requires kdeedu-kstars = 0:4.2.4-1.fc11
ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.x86_64 requires libpl.so.5.7.6()(64bit)
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(actionpack) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2
rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-11-i386:
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586 requires libclips.so.1
fedora-business-cards-0.2.4.2-2.fc11.noarch requires inkscape >= 0:0.47-0.11.20090602svn
rubygem-main-2.8.4-2.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) >= 0:1.0.3
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc:
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.ppc requires libclips.so.1
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires libclips.so.1()(64bit)
fedora-business-cards-0.2.4.2-2.fc11.noarch requires inkscape >= 0:0.47-0.11.20090602svn
rubygem-main-2.8.4-2.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) >= 0:1.0.3
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc64:
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires libclips.so.1()(64bit)
f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0
f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0
f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0
f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0
fedora-business-cards-0.2.4.2-2.fc11.noarch requires inkscape >= 0:0.47-0.11.20090602svn
rubygem-main-2.8.4-2.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) >= 0:1.0.3
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-11-x86_64:
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586 requires libclips.so.1
clipsmm-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64 requires libclips.so.1()(64bit)
fedora-business-cards-0.2.4.2-2.fc11.noarch requires inkscape >= 0:0.47-0.11.20090602svn
rubygem-main-2.8.4-2.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) >= 0:1.0.3
14 years, 9 months
midi seq interface vs. fc11: #505421
by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hi... anyone out there could help with the bugzilla bug 505421?? Filed
on 2009-06-11, no answers of substance yet and no workaround suggested.
Should be easy, a module is not being loaded on demand, it was before.
I keep getting questions about this on the Planet CCRMA list, it makes
midi unusable for a normal user, anyone installing fc11 for audio _will_
stumble into this problem. It was working, it is broken, please fix it!
-- Fernando
14 years, 9 months
possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?
by Andre Robatino
The names of the 32-bit Live CDs already use i686, consistent with the
minimum required arch. But the 32-bit DVD still uses i386, despite the
fact that not only has i586 been required for years, but with the i586
package rebuild, there aren't even any i386 packages on the DVD anymore.
Now i686 is required and all packages are i686 (or noarch). I'd like
to file a bug to get this changed, in order to increase the chance it
actually happens by F12 Final. (The 32-bit F12 Alpha TC is still named
using i386.) Is this possible, and if so, under what component should I
file it?
14 years, 9 months
Slip of Fedora 12 Alpha by one week
by Jesse Keating
Today in the release engineering meeting, it was decided to enact a one
week slip of the Fedora 12 Alpha release date. This is due to remaining
bugs on the F12Alpha tracker preventing creation of a release candidate
and preventing testing of proposed fixes. We expect to be able to
test/clear the list early this week, therefor only a week slip is needed
at this time. The new Alpha release date August 25th. As soon as we
have a successful Alpha compose we will lift the Alpha freeze and allow
rawhide to move forward.
We also agreed to adjust the final schedule based on Alpha slipping,
however we are deferring that discussion to a later date, once we've
successfully composed Fedora 12 Alpha. John Poelstra will send mail
regarding this later.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
14 years, 9 months
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2009-08-10
by Jesse Keating
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting...
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting...
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting...
Meeting log
-----------
* **roll call** (Oxf13-18:08:41_)
* **old business** (Oxf13-18:14:50_)
* **orphans (old business)** (Oxf13-18:15:37_)
* *ACTION*: Oxf13 will send warning about recursively removing cryptix
today (Oxf13-18:16:43_)
* **critical path (old business)** (Oxf13-18:17:11_)
* *LINK*: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126049
(dgilmore-18:19:30_)
* *ACTION*: Oxf13 will make sure the latest fedora-packager gets
tagged for Alpha so that the tag-request make target can be used.
(Oxf13-18:20:01_)
* *ACTION*: lmacken still needs to report on critical path bodhi
updates (Oxf13-18:20:46_)
* **rpm changes (old business)** (Oxf13-18:21:15_)
* *ACTION*: dgilmore will draft an SOP (with help) for managing RPM
changes in rawhide (Oxf13-18:21:42_)
* **no frozen rawhide (old business)** (Oxf13-18:21:56_)
* **signing (old business)** (Oxf13-18:23:01_)
* **Fedora 12 Alpha** (Oxf13-18:24:22_)
* *AGREED*: A newer anaconda will be tagged today, even if it's known
broken, to help with verifying other bug fixes. (Oxf13-18:35:09_)
* *AGREED*: Slip alpha 1 week. Intend to slip final one week. Discuss
schedule consequences at the planned release readiness meeting while
using logistics list to gather feedback. (Oxf13-19:10:12_)
* **open floor** (Oxf13-19:19:41_)
* *ACTION*: Oxf13 will announce Alpha slip (Oxf13-19:20:44_)
* *ACTION*: poelcat will announce intention to slip final and start
discussion on logistics list to discuss impact of such slip.
(Oxf13-19:21:47_)
* *AGREED*: no need to vette the slip decision via FESCo
(Oxf13-19:23:51_)
* *ACTION*: Oxf13 to deliver F12 key ID to notting for mash configs
(Oxf13-19:28:29_)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
14 years, 9 months
Makefile target to download SourceX file
by Douglas E. Warner
Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file (similar to
Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added benefit of
simplifying the update process for new versions (ex: "make source NUM=0"
instead of manually downloading the file).
-Doug
14 years, 9 months
UTF-8 specfiles, better upstream tarball commits coming
by Ville Skyttä
Hello,
I ran a few scripts on the CVS tree and will commit the resulting improvements
in a few days to devel and rebuild changed packages if ACL's allow. Let me
know if you for some reason don't want your packages touched (affected package
lists below).
1) Convert remaining non-UTF-8 specfiles to UTF-8. This is a no-brainer.
2) A number of packages are not using the "best" _upstream_ (I'm not
repackaging anything) tarball available that we can use. Using the best
available one will result in smaller srpm sizes, less downloading from CVS
lookaside cache and upstreams etc. I'm defining goodness in descending order
as: xz, lzma, bz2, gz, zip, tar; and will compare tarball contents before
making any changes. Packages whose SourceX URLs are bad are almost certainly
missed in this batch. There are two scenarios where I'm going to make other
changes besides just change the tarball in order to keep it possible for
packagers to easily keep sharing specfiles between branches:
2a) If the tarball is going to be switched to an lzma one and the package has
an EL-5 branch that seems relatively up to date with the devel branch, I'll
add "BuildRequires: lzma" because while the EL-5 rpmbuild's %setup knows what
to do with lzma tarballs, it doesn't have a dependency on lzma.
2b) If the tarball would be switched to an xz one but the package has
relatively up to date F-10 or EL branches, I'm not going to switch the tarball
or build at all but will add a TODO comment to the specfile noting that such a
tarball would be available, because F-10 and EL rpmbuilds' %setup doesn't grok
xz tarballs.
Packages with non-UTF-8 specfiles:
----------------------------------
doxygen
enscript
fluxbox
fluxconf
GConf2
gnome-vfs2
intltool
irda-utils
jakarta-commons-digester
jlex
joystick
kdbg
lapack
libksba
librsvg2
logjam
mkinitrd
psgml
psutils
rarpd
sip
splint
switchdesk
system-config-kickstart
talk
velocity
werken-xpath
yp-tools
Packages that may have a better upstream tarball available:
-----------------------------------------------------------
(not necessarily all of these will be touched)
abcm2ps
anjuta
archimedes
autoconf
autogen
avr-gdb
bigboard
bluez
cflow
cluster-glue
CodeAnalyst-gui
compiz-manager
conduit
curl
cylindrix
deletemail
dnsmasq
doodle
dosfstools
eggdrop
emacs
epic
ewl
expect
fspy
gajim
gaupol
geany-plugins
gedit-plugins
gget
giggle
gnash
gnome-packagekit
gnome-power-manager
gnonlin
gnucash
gpm
gsh
gtk-vnc
hal
hatools
highlight
hotwire
hunspell-fo
icon-naming-utils
inkboy-fonts
irssi
jam
java-1.6.0-openjdk
kiosktool
KoboDeluxe
lftp
libcmpiutil
libgdbus
libgdl
libsexy
libtheora
libtool
libuninum
libzip
lzma
m4
maradns
mikmod
minbar
moserial
mpfr
msr-tools
netbeans-resolver
nfoview
notify-python
obexd
online-desktop
pacemaker
parted
perl-qooxdoo-compat
php-magickwand
pipenightdreams
pixman
ppl
proj
psad
python-kiwi
python-pp
qt-creator
redet
redet-doc
reiserfs-utils
resource-agents
rfdump
rxtx
sed
spamass-milter
spring
straw
subversion
surl
tango-icon-theme
teseq
texinfo
udpcast
ustr
warzone2100
ytalk
zenon
zlib
14 years, 9 months
FedoraStudio: the final step
by Orcan Ogetbil
Hello everyone,
(If you don't own a multimedia package you can skip this thread)
This is a call for help for adjusting the .desktop files of your
multimedia applications according to the new FedoraStudio feature [1].
For those who missed the news, with F-12 we will have an optional
multimedia-menus package that will subcategorize the Sound&Video menu
in Gnome (Multimedia menu in KDE). This package is currently geared
towards multimedia creation folks, however this target audience may be
expanded in the future to meet the demand.
To place the applications in the proper category, the .desktop files
need to have proper categories listed. Since I am a (co)maintainer of
most audio creation packages in Fedora, I have finished most of the
required work. However there are a few packages left that need to be
addressed.
So please follow the link [2] and check if your multimedia package
meets the criteria for any of the submenus we will have. If you have
any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. I will do a final check
around September 8th, about two weeks before the beta freeze and fix
the remaining .desktop files. Also let me know if you don't want your
package to be touched.
Thanks for your time!
Orcan
PS: Adjusting your .desktop file with this specification will not
change the experience of anyone who doesn't have the multimedia-menus
package installed. Your application will be still in the
Sound&Video/Multimedia desktop menu as long as you have "AudioVideo"
listed as a category in your .desktop file.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio#Outline
14 years, 9 months
Ongoing effort to package JOSM
by Andrea Musuruane
Hi,
Cédric OLIVIER has submitted a review request for JOSM, an editor
for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/508351
Since I'm an OSM contributor, a JOSM user and a Fedora packager, I
tried to address some of the problem the package has with some
informal reviews (I'm not a sponsor and Cédric is looking for one).
The most evident mistake is that the package is using pre-built JAR
files instead of system JARs. These libraries are not yet available in
Fedora. To speed things up, I packaged them and submitted for review:
Gettext-commons:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/515136
Metadata-extractor:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/516343
Although I maintain more than 20 packages in Fedora and RPM Fusion,
these are my first two Java packages. Any hint or suggestion on how to
improve them is well accepted. A reviewer is welcome too :)
In metadata-extractor I had to disable junit test. This is something
Debian package does too. But I do not understand why enabling it I get
the following error:
---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
[...]
test:
BUILD FAILED
/home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Problem:
failed to create task or type junit
Cause: the class
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask was not found.
This looks like one of Ant's optional components.
Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in
-/usr/share/ant/lib
-/home/andrea/.ant/lib
-a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument
Do not panic, this is a common problem.
The commonest cause is a missing JAR.
This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem
---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
Any help appreciated.
Bye,
Andrea.
14 years, 9 months