Well, in that case any of those .static symlinks should be properly built static in their respective .spec/RPMs they reside from. Maybe another item for the Sbin project?
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:07 PM To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: few ideas how to make fedora better as a desktop
"Shawn Starr" sstarr@platform.com writes:
Top posting kills kittens.
Well, if you did a ldd on a unix box you'd notice binaries
in /sbin were staticly built.
Depends how you define Unix then. I don't have any actual Unix certified OS's around, but Fedora certainly doesn't link everything in /sbin statically.
My favourite:
$ ldd /sbin/dump.static linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x00ca6000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00d0d000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0058e000) libbz2.so.1 => /lib/libbz2.so.1 (0x00cfa000) libblkid.so.1 => /lib/libblkid.so.1 (0x00c66000) libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x00c8a000) libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0x0060e000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00336000) libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x00765000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x003e6000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0056c000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x003c7000)
(Yes that's cheating, /sbin/dump.static is a symlink. But still funny.)
/Benny
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list