They've already fixed it in xorg, see:
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
patch is very simple and short. Any reasons why this is not applied in rawhide?
Is it possible to have it in FC3?
cheers, Jarek
No answer, hmmm. So, should I understand, that it's not important at all? I thought ATI are quite popular theese days.
Jarek
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:22:14 +0200 Jaroslaw Gorny jgorny@aurox.org wrote:
They've already fixed it in xorg, see:
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
patch is very simple and short. Any reasons why this is not applied in rawhide?
Is it possible to have it in FC3?
Jaroslaw Gorny wrote :
No answer, hmmm. So, should I understand, that it's not important at all? I thought ATI are quite popular theese days.
Unfortunately, because of the final freeze, you may have to wait for an Xorg errata later on before getting that on FC3 :-(
Matthias
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:37:10 +0200 Matthias Saou thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net wrote:
Jaroslaw Gorny wrote :
No answer, hmmm. So, should I understand, that it's not important at all? I thought ATI are quite popular theese days.
Unfortunately, because of the final freeze, you may have to wait for an Xorg errata later on before getting that on FC3 :-(
Final freeze? But I've seen in rawhide-report some new patches (also for ATI cards) in xorg two or three days ago.
and in rawhide report: 20041020 changes I've found:
- Add xorg-x11-6.8.1-init-origins-fix.patch, which fixes a crash for some invalid xorg.conf combinations (#134967).
Can You please tell me what kind of patches can be included _after_ final freeze? I just want to know in case I'll have similar questions in the future...
regards, Jarek