On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ tomek@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in a media server context.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 7:09 AM Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ tomek@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in a media server context.
Just a quick comment: these topics were all addressing feedback from different (anonymize) respondents. Please read the full meeting log for details.
The two topics in question here were unrelated and were separate suggestions for how we might proceed. No decision was yet made, as we are currently going through a brainstorming exercise.
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ tomek@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in a media server context.
Gut feeling, anecdata (with me included). I believe you know enterprise Fedora users, but around my acquaintances home deployments are much more prevalent. I would love to see more Fedora usage in companies. I think the proposition is not about dismissing enterprise servers. It is about recognizing *the other* big group of Fedora deployment and treating both groups equally.
On 8 April 2018 at 07:08, Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ tomek@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in a media server context.
These are falling trees in the forest though. It isn't that they don't make a sound. It is just that no one really hears it and we have no way to know what they want/do if they don't. It is the same with every other 'enterprise' group in any other platform. Telling you that they are using it is no good if it means that you have to be in every meeting ever to represent them. You don't scale that far.
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh, 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in a media server context.
These are falling trees in the forest though. It isn't that they don't make a sound. It is just that no one really hears it and we have no way to know what they want/do if they don't. It is the same with every other 'enterprise' group in any other platform. Telling you that they are using it is no good if it means that you have to be in every meeting ever to represent them. You don't scale that far.
My point was that one person's personal experience doesn't make it default and the norm as everyone has different experiences.