whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
Jeremy
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
Jeremy
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
Does the new Nvidia driver support aiglx ?
On 4/9/06, Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 13:59 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Does the new Nvidia driver support aiglx ?
On 4/9/06, Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
No. AFAIK, only the 9x.xx series (Which rumored to be released in Q3/06) will include Aiglx (GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap) support.
Gilboa.
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
Will this work with the new nvidia drivers? Version1.0.8756 released 04-07-06. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=67864
Thanks, Demond
Demond James wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
Will this work with the new nvidia drivers? Version1.0.8756 released 04-07-06. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=67864
Thanks, Demond
I haven't tryed yet but I would say no. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68104
dragoran wrote:
Demond James wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 09:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
whats the current status of aiglx development? the FC5 binarys have not been updated since inital release. Is the x86_64 bug solved? Can it be added to rawhide to get more testing? Or is it still not ready for rawhide ?
The aiglx code is already in the main trunk of xorg development being targeted for Xorg 7.1. Packages tracking that are already present in rawhide
thats means x86_64 is supported now?
Worked on my x86_64 box with a radeon at the office when I tried a few weeks ago. I haven't tried since between vacation and LinuxWorld/FUDCon
Jeremy
Will this work with the new nvidia drivers? Version1.0.8756 released 04-07-06. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=67864
Thanks, Demond
I haven't tryed yet but I would say no. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68104
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=866581&postcount=5 Can someone update the wiki and note this?