On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 16:49, schrieb Steve Gordon:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reindl Harald" h.reindl@thelounge.net
So the likely effect is that these features will be called ready whenever they need to be (according to the process) with the rest simply called "optimizing".
if people do not care the can destroy every process if someone calls repeatly non-ready features as ready he is the wrong person for any sort of decision
maybe the project should get rid of some people who do not care or guidelines which have the power to ENFORCE contributors or get rid of them
yes this may sound hard but what is the alternative?
burn down ressources with each relese more and more
Where can I review your formal submission(s) for such improvements?
they do not exist because fedoras feature-quality at release burns down way to much of my time to maintain > 20 machines with fedora and rebuild half of the distribution to fix design bugs
so if the releases would be more well thought i would have time to write such things, but then there would be no need for it
I haven't seen much tangible change in the direction Fedora is heading as a result of all your emails, spending some of that time on formal suggestions for improvement may change this.
Cheers, Peter