On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to writes:
lordsawar has a gfdl manual that is installed. Does that need to be reflected in the license tag such that it should be GPLv2+ and GFDL1.1+, instead of just GPLv2+?
legal@lists.fedoraproject.org would be the right place to ask that, but I'm pretty sure the answer you'll get is "yes".
You could possibly split the manual into a documentation subpackage with its own License: tag if you wanted to keep the license tags clear.
FWIW, when I have a package with a complex licensing case, I usually stick a comment in the spec explaining exactly what stuff is under each license.