On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 14:04 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jesse Keating (jkeating@redhat.com) said:
I was thinking about this over the weekend. We have "shutdown" sections in services so that you can restart a service while running, however we don't necessarily have to "shut down" the services when we shut down the system.
Right, and not doing it cuts shutdown in half. However, since it's a change in interface, you'd have to tag each service that you don't care about shutting down separately. Which sucks.
would this be as a simple as modifying chkconfig so that if there isn't a 3rd field in the: # chkconfig: levels start_order stop_order
line in an initscript that it just didn't make the stop symlink?
Doesn't this potentially interfere with un-mounting file systems? So we always kill -9 em?
Simo.