On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 22:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi Jan,
Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta Freeze is next week not this week.
Dennis
Er. Yes. That's a point.
I tend to just take it on faith that the schedules get adjusted after slips, but AFAICS, the F24 schedule was not adjusted after the Alpha slip. https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases/24/Schedule&di ff=439901&oldid=435873 is when the wiki schedule was adjusted for the Alpha slip, but the only date that was changed was the Alpha release date, no other dates were touched.
As things stand it's possible we could make the non-adjusted Beta dates, though there's some missing test coverage we'd really need to get to, but it's definitely not what we've done before without an explicit decision to *not* change the later dates.
I have only changed the Alpha release date and intentionally have left the Beta and Final the same. This has been communicated to Marketing, unfortunately (my fault) not to rel-eng nor QA. The reason was mainly not to affect F25. Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ?
From QA's side we can at least try to make the unamended date, as I said.