-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
At the upcoming FUDCon I plan to hold a session or two regarding requirements and discussions about the future of our package source control. This is NOT a time to argue about one SCM being "better" than another. I don't really want to hear any SCM names at all, rather I'm interested purely in only what we require and what we'd like out of our package source control. I'm sending this mail to get people thinking about it, and to give the people who won't be at FUDCon a chance at dropping their thoughts in.
...
I'll be gathering feedback over the next few days and putting them into a not as of yet created wiki page.
Being able to keep classify patches: - - backports from upstream SCM - - fixes for upstream, already forwarded (with integration to upstream bug-filing system if possible, or at least the bug report URL) - - fixes for upstream, unsent (still being tested or cleaned-up) - - Fedora-specific fixes, not to be forwarded
Regards,
- -- Michel Salim