Rex Dieter wrote:
When it comes to *current* reviews/packages, simply follow the current guidelines.
Sure, that seems obvious. But there has been confusion about usage of a vendor_id previously (which I attributed to reviewers mistaking vendor_id for the Vendor: spec file tag). What I was wondering was whether there was an effort to change the guidelines regarding the vendor_id. If there is, the issues that *may* be caused by dropping a vendor_id from an existing .desktop file need to be addressed.