Hi Michael
I'm not sure of what packaging mistakes you are talking. I just updated the spec file and removed the requires field.
But yes, I'd like to give it for review now.
Bests, Joël
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 21:57:07 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
Hi all
Just modified the gsequencer.spec file. Now, it should be more the fedora way.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ags/files/fedora/
Additionally, I uploaded the srpm and rpm packages built.
- gsequencer
- gsequencer-devel
- gsequencer-devel-docs
- gsequencer-debuginfo
So, do you want to offer it for official package review or not? It still contains a lot of packaging mistakes _not_ specific to Fedora. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org