Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com said:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:57 -0600 Chris Adams cmadams@hiwaay.net wrote:
I would think that making it release based rather than time based should be okay. If there have been N released shipped without package foo, then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or 2).
Possibly, but that info isn't super easy to find. You would need to look at the scm-commits list to see when it was retired.
If it was release-1 or release-2, those are both current and still getting updates; checking the current trees on a mirror would show if the package was in either release.