On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:39:47AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:58:32AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Yes, FESCo
- should have recognized early that the scope of the feature was not
thought through and that more pieces are needed (contrary to claims back in the end of October that "everything is already implemented and works")
<nod> So one idea would be that a specific FESCo member needs to step up to be the "collaboration guide" (Must think of a better name for that :-) for a feature. They would be in charge of the feature, watch it as it evolves. Pick apart all the points where it requires coordination with other groups. And make sure that those groups were informed that the feature was in progress.
Feature Shepherd?