On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:59:52 +0100 Jochen Schmitt Jochen@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Kevin Fenzi schrieb:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages
After a first look on this proposel I have some question and comments:
1.) Is the approving process the same as if I submit a new package request.
No. This is only for renaming existing packages already reviewed and in the collection.
2.) Because the CVSAdmin request need a bugzilla ticket, why we don't doing the relating approving process in the same ticket.
We could. That would be more overhead however.
3.) If we not need a full review process, I think anyone should approve that the right Provides/Requires statement existing in the new package. A lightwight approvement process may has the advance that the maintaining process of an existing package will not delayed for a long time by the renaming process.
Agreed.
4.) Each people which has the right to done a normal package review should be abled to approve a renamed package.
Also agreed.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
kevin