On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 12:02:26PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
If we want to change the default here, let's do some proper cleanup:
- the split between ESP and XBOOTLDR is only useful in the case where ESP already existed and was small. If the installer is *creating* an ESP, it should just make it large enough.
And install kernels to /boot/efi in case /boot is not a XBOOTLDR filesystem?
If /boot is not a XBOOTLDR, then we only have one file system which is the ESP. It could be mounted on /boot or on /efi or maybe even /boot/efi (*). The kernels would then go to /boot/EFI/Linux, /efi/EFI/Linux, or /boot/efi/EFI/Linux, respectively. (When you write /boot/efi, it's not clear what exactly you mean. The duplication of "efi" and "EFI" on on case-insensitive system is confusing.)
(*) This is actually something that'd need to be figure out. /boot/efi is the worst choice; either /boot or /efi would be OK, but something needs to be chosen.
- having a second partition with a second (different) file system implementation just increases the footprint and attack surface for no gain. If we create XBOOTLDR, make it like the ESP (i.e. VFAT in almost all realistic scenarios).
While being at it also give the XBOOTLDR the correct type uuid according to the discoverable partitions spec.
Of course ;-]
Zbyszek