On 02/09/2013 01:52 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Stephen Michael Kellat
<skellat(a)fastmail.net> wrote:
> "Corresponding source shall be accessible via non-proprietary means of
> access without charge, need for identity verification, or user traffic
> logging."
>
That would seem to prohibit even basic logging of HTTP traffic, which
would be unacceptable to most sysadmins and possibly unenforceable in
some jurisdictions. I don't think that's what you intended, but the
wording is sufficiently vague. "Non-proprietary" would also require
greater clarity if it ever came to litigation.
I agree. For now I wanted to throw a first draft out. I'm still
thinking about ways to cleaning it up some within Richard's 25 word limit.
Stephen Michael Kellat