On 18/06/13 06:16, Richard Fontana wrote:
Of late I've been trying to do something I believe I talked
about
before, re-implement copyleft-next as a 'file-based' copyleft that is
less minimalist than MPL.
That would seem to me to be a sigificant change of direction for the
project; the difference in copyleft scope between a GPL-like and an
MPL-like licence is not trivial.
Might there be those who are keen to see copyleft-next continue with the
current approach? Are there enough of them that what we really have here
are two different -nexts?
Gerv