On 11/27/2012 12:18 AM, Richard Fontana wrote:
I'd be willing to go with this:
The invalidity or unenforceability under applicable law of any
provision of this License does not affect the validity or
enforceability of the remainder of this License. Such provision is
to be reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it valid and
enforceable.
Though the second sentence no doubt violates some pedantic Adams rule
against use of the passive voice. :)
Actually I now see that Adams recommends this approach:
"When a provision expressing an obligation is directed not only at the
parties but also at any court that is considering a dispute arising
under the contract.... [a] more politic option would be /is to be/
...." (Section 3.49)
- RF