I was just looking at the menu layout in the new web interface and felt a
tug at my sensibility regarding the configuration and resource submenus.
On one hand I think a separation could be good, on the other I am
questioning what the valid separation point should be. I think Management
Classes and Repos might fit better grouped with Packages and Files, and
possibly even some other re-organizing. Then comes the question of are the
names of the sections even right? Maybe 'Configuration' is a bad name for
the first section? Anyone have any thoughts?
<
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/logout>
Configuration
- Distros <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/distro/list>
- Profiles <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/profile/list>
- Systems <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/system/list>
- Repos <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/repo/list>
- Images <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/image/list>
- Kickstart Templates<http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/ksfile/list>
- Snippets <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/snippet/list>
- Management Classes<http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/mgmtclass/list>
Resources
- Packages <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/package/list>
- Files <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/file/list>
Actions
- Import DVD <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/import/prompt>
- Sync <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/sync> ☼
- Reposync <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/reposync> ☼
- Hardlink <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/hardlink> ☼
- Build ISO <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/buildiso> ☼
Cobbler
- Settings <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/settings>
- Check <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/check>
- Events <
http://cobbler.aotx.ao.dcn/cobbler_web/events>
- Online Documentation <
https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/wiki/UserDocs>
- Online Help Chat <
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#cobbler>