On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:05:06PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)mattdm.org> wrote:
> Question One:
>
> How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to
> change them to more descriptive names:
If they're from separate tarballs, obviously we'd want to match the
naming and have them be separate source packages. If they're just
subpackages, rename them! And probably make sure to provide the
upstream names for compatibility's sake, but I'm a big fan of names
that are parseable
They are subpacakges: we have a single giant tarball where we build both
the java components (clc, sc and walrus) and the C components (nc, cc and
gl) and the spec file we have reflects that, building everything in one go
but creating multiple packages.
cheers
graziano
- Jeremy
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
--
Graziano Obertelli
Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.
130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117
Office: 805-845-8000
www.eucalyptus.com