cloud October 2017

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
21 discussions

Python is missing in Fedora AWS AMIs
by Danishka Navin 30 Dec '22

30 Dec '22

Hi team, Is there any specific reason to drop python from Fedora AMIs in AWS? Regards, -- Danishka Navin http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/danishkanavin

6 5

[cloud-sig] Issue #282: Make sure official Fedora AMIs are in new regions as they come online
by Matthew Miller 27 Nov '17

27 Nov '17

mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `cloud-sig` that you are following: `` See https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/139 I'm looking into what we can do about the non-official and possibly malicious AMIs, but a first-line defense should be making sure we expand to these new regions right away when they come online. Since we're (still; *sigh*) not in the Marketplace, we need to make sure this happens by hand. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/282

3 3

firewalld in atomic host
by Dusty Mabe 02 Nov '17

02 Nov '17

NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'. I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host. Recently I was trying to figure out the best way to explain to other users how to set firewall rules on atomic host. Usually I would say add your rules and then iptables-save, but on Atomic Host docker has added it's firewall rules in there dynamically so if you iptables-save you'll get a bunch of stuff that you don't want in your static configuration. There are ways around this; manually create your config file, or use iptables-save and then rip the docker stuff out. Either way it's a bit of a pain. I think firewalld would make this easier on the user. Not sure of the pro/con ratio though. Thoughts? Dusty

4 8

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement
by noreply＠fedoraproject.org 31 Oct '17

31 Oct '17

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree commit: Commit: c099633883cd8d06895e32a14c63f6672072430c151de882223e4abe20efa7ca Version: 26.157 Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host upgrade` or `atomic host deploy`. Corresponding image media for new installations can be downloaded from: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/download/ Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-26-201710… https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-26-201710… For direct download, the "latest" targets are always available here: https://getfedora.org/atomic_iso_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_latest Filename fetching URLs are available here: https://getfedora.org/atomic_iso_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_latest_filename For more information about the latest targets, please reference the Fedora Cloud Wiki space. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud#Quick_Links Do note that it can take some of the mirrors up to 12 hours to "check-in" at their own discretion. Thank you, Fedora Release Engineering

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 31 Oct '17

31 Oct '17

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2017-11-01 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

2017-10-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 27 Blocker Review Meeting
by Adam Williamson 30 Oct '17

30 Oct '17

# F27 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2017-10-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers, 1 proposed Final freeze exception, and 1 proposed Server Beta blocker, so let's have a Fedora 27 blocker review meeting. If you have time tonight, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F27 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Note that for the special case of the Server release being split from the main release stream for Fedora 27, we have created separate Server blocker tracking bugs and will be following the same basic process for the Server release dates using those trackers. Have a good night and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

[fedora-atomic] PR #91: Base for f27
by Patrick "マルタインアンドレアス" Uiterwijk 27 Oct '17

27 Oct '17

puiterwijk opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following: `` Base for f27 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/91

2 5

[fedora-atomic] PR #90: Make the list of repos empty in the default inherit chain
by Patrick "マルタインアンドレアス" Uiterwijk 27 Oct '17

27 Oct '17

puiterwijk opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following: `` Make the list of repos empty in the default inherit chain `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/90

4 11

F27 Final validation testing requests
by Adam Williamson 27 Oct '17

27 Oct '17

Hi folks! So I was looking through testcase_stats for F27 and I noticed several tests that haven't been run for some time, which we will need to run for Final. If folks could help out with running some of these, that'll be great. The current validation candidate (20171020.n.0) is fine, there should be a new one fairly soon too (maybe tomorrow). The Cloud x86_64 tests haven't been checked off since Beta; I'm not sure if there's really a need for those tests to be run manually given that we have autocloud, but if someone could check that'd be great. Several desktop tests haven't been run for x86_64 since Beta candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_login https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_audio_basic https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_panel_basic https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_automount https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_workstation_core_applications https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_menus https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_panel_advanced https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_keyring It'd be a big help if folks could help run those tests on x86_64 on both blocking desktops (GNOME and KDE). For Installation, we're missing a few: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_firmware_RAID https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_hardware_RAID https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_FCoE_target https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Basic_Vi… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_gnome-software_current_w… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_gnome-software_previous_… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Arabic_Language_Install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help Again, if folks could help with those it'd be great. (I will take care of at least the hardware RAID one tomorrow). As usual, you can use these links to find the 'current' result pages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test where you can find download links and manually enter results. You can also use the 'relval' CLI tool to enter results a bit more easily if you like, just 'dnf install relval' then 'relval report-results'. Thanks, everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

[fedora-atomic] PR #89: Add treefile for f27-updates-testing
by Patrick "マルタインアンドレアス" Uiterwijk 27 Oct '17

27 Oct '17

puiterwijk opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following: `` Add treefile for f27-updates-testing `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/89

2 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud October 2017