NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'.
I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host. Recently I was trying to
figure out the best way to explain to other users how to set firewall rules
on atomic host.
Usually I would say add your rules and then iptables-save, but on Atomic
Host docker has added it's firewall rules in there dynamically so if you iptables-save
you'll get a bunch of stuff that you don't want in your static configuration.
There are ways around this; manually create your config file, or use iptables-save
and then rip the docker stuff out. Either way it's a bit of a pain. I think
firewalld would make this easier on the user. Not sure of the pro/con ratio though.
Thoughts?
Dusty
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
manifest: Add microcode_ctl
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/69
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2017-08-02 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/
walters commented on the pull-request: `post: Work around LVM archival conflicting with ostree` that you are following:
``
Yeah, but the priority for me dropped way way down since for Fedora now we don't use devicemapper by default for Docker, and that makes LVM make backups way less often.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/27
jlebon commented on the pull-request: `post: Work around LVM archival conflicting with ostree` that you are following:
``
Would be nice to see this happen still. I'm sorely reminded of it every time I run `ostree admin config-diff` and have to swim through the output.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/27
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `cloud-sig` that you are following:
``
Now that the atomic working group has gained more identity separate from Fedora Cloud SIG, let's find a new time for a meeting. My initial thoughts are Monday at 15:00 UTC and maybe every other week.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/280
Folks:
As scheduled, we will be having a Virtual Fedora Activity Day focused on
the Atomic Host documentation this Friday, July 28th.
The day starts at 13:30 UTC (9:30 EDT, 19:00 IST), with a video
conference before we split up for work. The rest of the program may be
found on this etherpad:
http://etherpad.osuosl.org/fedora_atomic_docs_vfad
Before you come to the VFAD, please read that document. If you have a
chance beforehand -- or if you cannot make it to the VFAD at all --
please comment on the proposed documentation content in the etherpad.
Make sure and put your name in for your color so we know whose comments
belong to whom.
(note to folks on the cloud@ mailing list: we will soon stop using this
mailing list for Atomic stuff. please sign up for atomic-devel)
--
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS