On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi all,
Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
be published.
Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's
meant to go out. The bar is higher for articles about what we
deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles. It's hard to see how
a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this
one could.
Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds
for reportable news:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-b...
Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the
snafu here?
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com