1 Sep
2006
1 Sep
'06
6:40 p.m.
"CW" == Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu writes:
CW> A while ago and on a different list, tibbs proposed adding one CW> last bit to the buildcycle:
Actually I think it was this list.
Honestly I don't think this needs to be in mock, but mock really needs to continue to give me the means to do that kind of thing. I already have this running just fine with no mock modifications (with the caveat that I can't figure out how to do this full process on an x86_64 when building an i386 package).
- J<