On Dec 23, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Yaakov Nemoy
<loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> Would this require a second ks file that omits the package name, for
> the automated install, so that it will be on the media, but not
> actually installed by default?
The ks file that you compose from and the one that you install from
aren't the same thing. Not sure what the question is.
I was trying to avoid maintaining 2 ks files. I solved the problem by
using sed to create an install ks from the pungi ks.
joe