Ótimo link. Obrigado Rosset. Agora tenho um conjunto de critérios formais
para dar meu voto. Espero que as respostas para cada uma dessas perguntas
estejam claras nos perfis e tickets.
Em 15/03/2014 13:14, "Filipe Rosset" <rosset.filipe(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
Fonte:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sponsoring_event_attendees
Criteria
This section explains the criteria typically used by planners to decide
whether to subsidize the travel of a specific applicant.
Relevance
- *Is this person delivering information that is pertinent to an
ongoing project of concern at the event?* For example, a FUDCon that
includes a critical brainstorming session on Fedora packaging could be more
effective with the attendance of a proven packager.
- *Does the event provide an opportunity for this particular person to
attract contribution to one or more areas in the Fedora Project?* An
event that attracts computer-based designers, for instance, might present
an opportunity for a member of the Fedora Design team to attract new,
skilled contributors.
- *Is this person a current contributor?* Current contributors with a
proven history of involvement in some sense are a known quantity. This does
not mean that sponsorship shouldn't go to new or potential contributors,
but it is a factor for consideration.
Criticality
- *Does this person have demonstrated skills in an area that will
promote reaching the goals of the event?* For example, if the Fedora
Project's speaking schedule at an event requires someone with expertise on
RPM packaging and the Fedora build system, it would make sense to sponsor
the travel of someone who could give those talks.
- *Are there clear deliverables attached to this person's attendance
that otherwise cannot be achieved?* Deliverables come in many forms,
such as working code; completed documentation; or key decisions. If other
contributors involved in the same area are expected to attend already, will
this person's absence negatively impact their work at the event?
- *How important is this subsidy to the person's attendance?* Without
the full subsidy, will the applicant not be able to attend at all? Will a
partial subsidy suffice? Would a change in travel plans, such as attending
part of the event, still allow this person's goals to be achieved?
Specificity
- *Has this person provided substantial information about the specific
objectives to achieve through attending?* Sponsors should look at the
proposal critically, because there are usually more requests than can be
filled for a given event. The best requests tend to reflect clear vision
from the applicants of exactly what they will achieve through attendance,
and a link between that vision and the larger objectives of the Fedora
Project or a specific team.
- *Are the objectives achievable within the time frame of the event?*Sometimes it may
not be possible to meet every objective of the event
despite best intentions and hard work. Nevertheless, sponsors should also
carefully consider whether the deliverables can reasonably be finished by
the end of the event. Setting and meeting reasonable expectations is a good
habit for any project.
Proximity
- *Is this person located in the same region as the event?* Regionally
co-located people generally require less funding. It is not cost effective,
for instance, to fund the travel of multiple people from North America to a
European event. In specific cases there may be call for such subsidies, but
in general regional events should reflect regional attendance and
participation.
Expense
- *How expensive is the subsidy?* Each event typically has a set
budget; a higher subsidy amount should carry with it higher expectations,
more criticality, or other benefits that justify the expense. Keep in mind
that the transparent approval process creates better accountability for
sponsors in making decisions.
--
brasil-marketing mailing list
brasil-marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/brasil-marketing