Reviewing the DB schema, Ray noticed a puzzling "locked" table where he didn't know what it was for. I checked, and it corresponds to a Locked model element in the source, but we don't actually appear to refer to it anywhere.
Can anyone think of a reason we shouldn't just delete it in 0.16 as a legacy data model element that wasn't properly removed when it was no longer needed?
Cheers, Nick.
On 11/14/2013 01:45 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Reviewing the DB schema, Ray noticed a puzzling "locked" table where he didn't know what it was for. I checked, and it corresponds to a Locked model element in the source, but we don't actually appear to refer to it anywhere.
Can anyone think of a reason we shouldn't just delete it in 0.16 as a legacy data model element that wasn't properly removed when it was no longer needed?
Cheers, Nick.
All I can think of is in legacy RHTS you could "lock" certain key values so the inventory script couldn't update them. But it doesn't sound like it was actually implemented in beaker so I say nuke it.
Bill.
beaker-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Bill Peck -
Nick Coghlan