-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/11/2015 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi all.
> I see a lot of attempts to build 'seqan' on
aarch64 architecture;
> it's impossible for now. Are they automated?
Yes. It doesn't look that impossible as it's only a single test
that fails. Is it fixed in 2.0?
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5362/2995362/build.log
No,
unfortunately.
>> Since some days, there are also some
'sundials-2.6.1-6' rebuilds
>> on aarch64; they will fail every time because of a bad testing.
>> Yesterday i have built a new packaging release of 'sundials'
>> that should be packaged successfully even on aarch64.
> What's the new NVR for sundials? It should filter
through once it
> goes through updates etc on mainline.
sundials-2.6.1-7 may be built correctly on aarch64.
> Peter
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on
https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVUO4VAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8DskH/3n0Rg2qiKy85JgIG8m6RIAt
wh15qWA72y1zh3ChnErzD8ZWKPtL8YegMUalM4UMzy7ovGLxg3DjNIa9QFet0hwg
j2bbNK19Ts6CZlusNIRMNyvTBdqcYKiEjpnr4AqxVv7Wu8B/2ZzNgEnUMWKKC2lu
Nz0/MfM49c24586YQaZzFVIQmU3mujG1k0WjwI13CSZlFfxcqCyT0ckj7/Akga5U
NUZcjYbFcCAXQwGKCKLhNkVMfeqDWT3co4KSpwtJn6BOJXQq7iU7eJDfdf4v1IN1
TtpZz8viI4dMsY/T2Q6o+gO2PjUvfpkUw8YyJpkFqIt1zlciaqsDudiTPvtduW8=
=tmON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----