On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> wrote:
On 06/04/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Backus wrote:
> Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize
> that there are a lot of unknowns in the data, so it is difficult to draw
> any hard conclusions, but 25k is still much larger than 0. Splitting into
> i686 into i586 and i686 would give more insight into who still needs
> non-SSE2... Probably hurts my argument, though. :)
>
>
Jeff,
If you want to do the work involved to split up the 32-bit arches please
do it.
The discussion going on here is not a democratic vote on if non-x86_64
CPUs are supported. :)
Fair point. :)
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.backus(a)gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus