X86 August 2017

x86@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
7 discussions

Fwd: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?
by Stephen John Smoogen 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

Can anyone look at these and look for fixes? Thanks ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> Date: 28 August 2017 at 11:05 Subject: Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686? To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org On 08/28/2017 04:35 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482798 >> (Bug 1482798 - Illegal instruction in SHA1_Update() when used by chronyd) > > > That's definitely a bug for F27. nss-softok is broken in similar ways on fedora-26-i686 Ralf _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen.

4 5

Organizational Deadline
by Jeff Backus 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

Hi All, Not sure if anyone else is aware, but it looks like FESCo voted to give us until September 8th to get organized or i686 is being pulled from kernels for F28. The good news is that they are letting us define what "organized" means. The bad news is that the clocks ticking. So, thoughts? jeff -- Jeff Backus jeff.backus(a)gmail.com http://github.com/jsbackus

4 6

Re: Fwd: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?
by Daniel Hopson 30 Aug '17

30 Aug '17

> I'm actually questioning the utility of i686 at all if it requires SSE2, since I feel like there's a fairly slim generation of machines > that supported only i686 and did support SSE2. Corrected my typo.

1 0

Fwd: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?
by Stephen John Smoogen 28 Aug '17

28 Aug '17

1 0

Re: Organizational Deadline
by Jeff Backus 28 Aug '17

28 Aug '17

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I respectfully decline. > > josh We understand. Thanks for taking the time to read the previous e-mail. jeff -- Jeff Backus jeff.backus(a)gmail.com http://github.com/jsbackus

1 0

Fwd: No i686 build of grub2?
by Stephen John Smoogen 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

So this looks like someone is going to need to start working on what is broken in the x86_32 grub2. Any volunteers? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> Date: 23 August 2017 at 08:27 Subject: No i686 build of grub2? To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere between 2.02-8 and 2.02-10. I looked through the change log (but not the git log yet) and didn't see anything mentioning this, which I would have expected if it was an intentional change. So is this a new permanent feature going forward or a temporary oops? (I still have one machine I use regularly, that only runs i686 and it will probably be a while before I can afford to replace it.) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen.

1 1

Fwd: i386 Xen PV support still needed?
by Stephen John Smoogen 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

Are there any people on the list who are affected by this change enough to maintain it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> Date: 1 August 2017 at 08:19 Subject: i386 Xen PV support still needed? To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, glibc(a)fedoraproject.org We still build a special glibc variant for Xen which avoids certain segment-relative accesses which are difficult to emulate with paravirtualization.. Is this still needed? Can we drop it? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

X86 August 2017