On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 11:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 12:54 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 20:50 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Does this imply that we'll have to run dnf check-update, dnf
> > update and compare the package lists to find packages with broken deps
> > to give negative karma to for testing?
> >
>
> Comments from upstream on the bug suggest we use --best to get
> information on dep errors. dnf by default will not display these since
> they're apparently troublesome to the user.
Ideally of course we should be catching these with automation. But if
dnf usage becomes really widespread before we get
taskotron/depcheck-nextgen in place, we should add this info to the
updates-testing guide. thanks!
I just went ahead and added a note -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing .
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net