On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:37 -0600, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
>
> I've also seen problems with it not exiting when the main window goes
> away on an exit; I expect a few processes to stick around (1.4 had a
> couple that always remained running), but I was finding 16-20 "evolution"
> processes still happily chugging away. (I'd REALLY love "killev" to
be
> included for cases like that...;-)
Hmmm, haven't seen this one. Note that evolution --force-shutdown does
the same thing killev used to. If you see this, you might want to
strace/gdb one of the remaining processes and see what it's doing.
I did see the processes still around after an exit or at least a forced
shutdown/segfault. It wouldn't start up again until I killed the
processes running first.
> *nod* I can live with the ordering, as long as it's
"stable" (ie. doesn't
> keep changing out from under me each time I hit the IMAP server), but I
> can't see any rhyme or reason to the ordering either.
The ordering is alphabetical for me but with INBOX always first. I
wonder if it's just using the order given back by the IMAP server. What
server are you using it against?
I was doing mine against POP3 so it took the folders from the lower
version and I guess copied them. But mine were not alphabetical (yes
Inbox was at the top) after Inbox, as they were randomly placed down the
list.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"It's funny until someone gets hurt...then it's hilarious!"