Because there was no suggestions, I've made changes. [1] is non-blockig
now. And I have amended criterion in [2].
[1]
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > > testing this feature.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bug...
> > > [2]
> > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk
> > > [3]
> > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_rem...
> >
> > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding
> > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting
> > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha.
>
> Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be
enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion:
>
> "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with
appropriate information included"
>
> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_rem...
That seems reasonable to me. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net