On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 04:53 +0100, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
On Die, 2004-10-26 at 00:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> That is an unfortunate error of judgement on their part. Let's not
> compound it by advocating the fundamentally flawed snake oil which is
> SPF in an inappropriate forum.
Since you unfortunately decided to prolong the discussion about this
subject, what is your problem with SPF?
I agree with Thomas here. If you are going to pronounce such a thorough
condemnation of something, and do so with an authoritative tone, you
must provide some foundation for your views. Else it's just hot air.
Cheers,
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz(a)simpaticus.com>