On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hey, folks. So here's another proposal from an idea that was
mentioned
during the F18 cycle.
There's a few types of blocker bug that are basically no-brainers; it
doesn't make a lot of sense to waste time in blocker meetings discussing
them, and more importantly, sometimes they show up and we want to quickly
accept them as blockers and get the fixes in, but we have to try and track
down three people to vote +1 before they can be accepted.
So I'm proposing we invent something called 'automatic blockers': a list of
bug types that can be declared AcceptedBlocker by any single person in QA,
releng or devel. That decision could of course be challenged and changed if
needed.
Makes sense ... there is no point in discussion the obvious in
meetings ... the return of common sense ;)